Omaha vs La Crosse-Onalaska

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. La Crosse-Onalaska is 0.2% less expensive than Omaha.

0.2% less expensive

La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN is 0.2% less expensive than Omaha, NE-IA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.8 vs 91.9). A $100,000 salary in Omaha buys about the same as $99,846 in La Crosse-Onalaska; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 91.9 (Omaha) vs 91.8 (La Crosse-Onalaska)
  • $100k in Omaha ≈ $99,846 purchasing power in La Crosse-Onalaska
  • Rents drives the gap (-17.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair NE:WI 91.9→91.8

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE NE × WI
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Omaha
91.9
Cost Index
La Crosse-Onalaska
91.8
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Omaha, NE-IA and La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: La Crosse-Onalaska is 17.0 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Omaha corresponds to $99,846 in La Crosse-Onalaska.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Omaha
91.9
La Crosse-Onalaska
91.8
Goods
Omaha
94.1
La Crosse-Onalaska
93.8
Services
Omaha
76.4
La Crosse-Onalaska
89.5
Rents
Omaha
86.4
La Crosse-Onalaska
69.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Omaha would need to be in La Crosse-Onalaska for the same purchasing power:

In Omaha In La Crosse-Onalaska Difference
$50,000 $49,923 $-77
$75,000 $74,884 $-116
$100,000 $99,846 $-154
$150,000 $149,768 $-232
$ in Omaha = in La Crosse-Onalaska

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.9 → 91.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is La Crosse-Onalaska more expensive than Omaha?

La Crosse-Onalaska is 0.2% less expensive than Omaha. The overall cost index is 91.8 vs 91.9 (national average = 100).

What salary in La Crosse-Onalaska equals $100K in Omaha?

A $100,000 salary in Omaha has the same purchasing power as $99,846 in La Crosse-Onalaska. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Omaha and La Crosse-Onalaska?

Rents in Omaha are indexed at 86.4 while La Crosse-Onalaska is at 69.4 (national average = 100). Omaha has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.