Overall
- La Crosse-Onalaska
- 91.8
- Omaha
- 91.9
Diff +0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Omaha is 0.2% more expensive than La Crosse-Onalaska.
Omaha, NE-IA is 0.2% more expensive than La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 91.9 vs 91.8). A $100,000 salary in La Crosse-Onalaska buys about the same as $100,155 in Omaha; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WI:NE 91.8→91.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN and Omaha, NE-IA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Omaha is 17.0 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in La Crosse-Onalaska corresponds to $100,155 in Omaha.
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff -13.2 RPP
Diff +17.0 RPP
| Category | La Crosse-Onalaska | Omaha | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.8 | 91.9 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 94.1 | +0.3 |
| Services | 89.5 | 76.4 | -13.2 |
| Rents | 69.4 | 86.4 | +17.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in La Crosse-Onalaska would need to be in Omaha for the same purchasing power:
| In La Crosse-Onalaska | In Omaha | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,077 | +$77 |
| $75,000 | $75,116 | +$116 |
| $100,000 | $100,155 | +$155 |
| $150,000 | $150,232 | +$232 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.8 → 91.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Omaha is 0.2% more expensive than La Crosse-Onalaska. The overall cost index is 91.9 vs 91.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in La Crosse-Onalaska has the same purchasing power as $100,155 in Omaha. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in La Crosse-Onalaska are indexed at 69.4 while Omaha is at 86.4 (national average = 100). Omaha has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.