Overall
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
- Jacksonville
- 99.5
Diff -4.2 RPP
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater vs Jacksonville
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Jacksonville is 4% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
4% less expensive
Jacksonville, FL is 4% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 99.5 vs 103.7). A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater buys about the same as $95,962 in Jacksonville; the largest component gap is goods.
- Overall RPP 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater) vs 99.5 (Jacksonville)
- $100k in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater ≈ $95,962 purchasing power in Jacksonville
- Goods drives the gap (-8.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:FL 103.7→99.5
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · GOODS-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE WA × FL
- GOODS-LED Goods-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Jacksonville, FL is 4% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.2-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Jacksonville is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Goods leads the difference, with Jacksonville 8.8 points lower than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $95,962 in Jacksonville as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, then replace the national basket with your own.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater would need to be in Jacksonville for the same purchasing power:
| In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | In Jacksonville | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,981 | $-2,019 |
| $75,000 | $71,972 | $-3,028 |
| $100,000 | $95,962 | $-4,038 |
| $150,000 | $143,943 | $-6,057 |
$ in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater = in Jacksonville
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.7 → 99.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 105.0
- Jacksonville
- 96.2
Diff -8.8 RPP
Services
- Jacksonville
- 87.5
Diff -4.2 RPP
Rents
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 116.7
- Jacksonville
- 109.8
Diff -6.9 RPP
| Category | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Jacksonville | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.7 | 99.5 | -4.2 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.2 | -8.8 |
| Services | 91.7 | 87.5 | -4.2 |
| Rents | 116.7 | 109.8 | -6.9 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 103.7
Jacksonville 99.5
Goods
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 105.0
Jacksonville 96.2
Services
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 91.7
Jacksonville 87.5
Rents
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 116.7
Jacksonville 109.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
Jacksonville
99.5
Cost Index
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Jacksonville more expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
Jacksonville is 4% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. The overall cost index is 99.5 vs 103.7 (national average = 100).
What salary in Jacksonville equals $100K in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has the same purchasing power as $95,962 in Jacksonville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater and Jacksonville?
Rents in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater are indexed at 116.7 while Jacksonville is at 109.8 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.