Overall
- Logan
- 95.9
Diff -0.4 RPP
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin vs Logan
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Logan is 0.4% less expensive than Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin.
0.4% less expensive
Logan, UT-ID is 0.4% less expensive than Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.9 vs 96.3). A $100,000 salary in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin buys about the same as $99,573 in Logan; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 96.3 (Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin) vs 95.9 (Logan)
- $100k in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin ≈ $99,573 purchasing power in Logan
- Rents drives the gap (-13.7 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair TN:UT 96.3→95.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE TN × UT
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
96.3
Cost Index
Logan
95.9
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN and Logan, UT-ID are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Logan is 13.7 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin corresponds to $99,573 in Logan.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Logan
- 96.4
Diff +0.2 RPP
Services
- Logan
- 77.9
Diff +5.9 RPP
Rents
- Logan
- 91.0
Diff -13.7 RPP
| Category | Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin | Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.3 | 95.9 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 96.4 | +0.2 |
| Services | 72.0 | 77.9 | +5.9 |
| Rents | 104.6 | 91.0 | -13.7 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin 96.3
Logan 95.9
Goods
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin 96.2
Logan 96.4
Services
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin 72.0
Logan 77.9
Rents
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin 104.6
Logan 91.0
Vertical line = national average (100)
How the Price Gap Changed
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin and Logan share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.1 to 0.4 RPP points. Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 20.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (15.0 to 5.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin RPP | Logan RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.7 | 95.8 | 0.1 points Logan higher |
| 2012 | 97.4 | 92.5 | 4.8 points Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin higher |
| 2016 | 99.3 | 94.7 | 4.6 points Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin higher |
| 2020 | 95.9 | 91.3 | 4.6 points Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin higher |
| 2024 | 96.3 | 95.9 | 0.4 points Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin would need to be in Logan for the same purchasing power:
| In Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin | In Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,787 | $-213 |
| $75,000 | $74,680 | $-320 |
| $100,000 | $99,573 | $-427 |
| $150,000 | $149,360 | $-640 |
$ in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin = in Logan
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.3 → 95.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Logan more expensive than Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin?
Logan is 0.4% less expensive than Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin. The overall cost index is 95.9 vs 96.3 (national average = 100).
What salary in Logan equals $100K in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin?
A $100,000 salary in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin has the same purchasing power as $99,573 in Logan. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin and Logan?
Rents in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin are indexed at 104.6 while Logan is at 91.0 (national average = 100). Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.