Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin vs Cheyenne

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Cheyenne is 0.2% more expensive than Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin.

0.2% more expensive

Cheyenne, WY is 0.2% more expensive than Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.5 vs 96.3). A $100,000 salary in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin buys about the same as $100,159 in Cheyenne; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 96.3 (Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin) vs 96.5 (Cheyenne)
  • $100k in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin ≈ $100,159 purchasing power in Cheyenne
  • Rents drives the gap (-14.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TN:WY 96.3→96.5

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE TN × WY
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
96.3
Cost Index
Cheyenne
96.5
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN and Cheyenne, WY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Cheyenne is 14.8 points lower. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin corresponds to $100,159 in Cheyenne.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
96.3
Cheyenne
96.5
Goods
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
96.2
Cheyenne
95.4
Services
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
72.0
Cheyenne
78.0
Rents
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
104.6
Cheyenne
89.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin would need to be in Cheyenne for the same purchasing power:

In Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin In Cheyenne Difference
$50,000 $50,079 +$79
$75,000 $75,119 +$119
$100,000 $100,159 +$159
$150,000 $150,238 +$238
$ in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin = in Cheyenne

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.3 → 96.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cheyenne more expensive than Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin?

Cheyenne is 0.2% more expensive than Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin. The overall cost index is 96.5 vs 96.3 (national average = 100).

What salary in Cheyenne equals $100K in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin?

A $100,000 salary in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin has the same purchasing power as $100,159 in Cheyenne. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin and Cheyenne?

Rents in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin are indexed at 104.6 while Cheyenne is at 89.8 (national average = 100). Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.