Cheyenne vs Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin is 0.2% less expensive than Cheyenne.

0.2% less expensive

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN is 0.2% less expensive than Cheyenne, WY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.3 vs 96.5). A $100,000 salary in Cheyenne buys about the same as $99,841 in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 96.5 (Cheyenne) vs 96.3 (Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin)
  • $100k in Cheyenne ≈ $99,841 purchasing power in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
  • Rents drives the gap (+14.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WY:TN 96.5→96.3

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE WY × TN
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Cheyenne
96.5
Cost Index
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
96.3
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Cheyenne, WY and Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin is 14.8 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Cheyenne corresponds to $99,841 in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Cheyenne
96.5
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
96.3
Goods
Cheyenne
95.4
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
96.2
Services
Cheyenne
78.0
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
72.0
Rents
Cheyenne
89.8
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
104.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Cheyenne would need to be in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin for the same purchasing power:

In Cheyenne In Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin Difference
$50,000 $49,921 $-79
$75,000 $74,881 $-119
$100,000 $99,841 $-159
$150,000 $149,762 $-238
$ in Cheyenne = in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.5 → 96.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin more expensive than Cheyenne?

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin is 0.2% less expensive than Cheyenne. The overall cost index is 96.3 vs 96.5 (national average = 100).

What salary in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin equals $100K in Cheyenne?

A $100,000 salary in Cheyenne has the same purchasing power as $99,841 in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Cheyenne and Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin?

Rents in Cheyenne are indexed at 89.8 while Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin is at 104.6 (national average = 100). Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.