Logan vs Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin is 0.4% more expensive than Logan.

0.4% more expensive

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN is 0.4% more expensive than Logan, UT-ID on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.3 vs 95.9). A $100,000 salary in Logan buys about the same as $100,428 in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 95.9 (Logan) vs 96.3 (Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin)
  • $100k in Logan ≈ $100,428 purchasing power in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
  • Rents drives the gap (+13.7 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair UT:TN 95.9→96.3

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE UT × TN
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Logan
95.9
Cost Index
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
96.3
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Logan, UT-ID and Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin is 13.7 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Logan corresponds to $100,428 in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Logan
95.9
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
96.3
Goods
Logan
96.4
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
96.2
Services
Logan
77.9
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
72.0
Rents
Logan
91.0
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin
104.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Logan would need to be in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin for the same purchasing power:

In Logan In Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin Difference
$50,000 $50,214 +$214
$75,000 $75,321 +$321
$100,000 $100,428 +$428
$150,000 $150,643 +$643
$ in Logan = in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.9 → 96.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin more expensive than Logan?

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin is 0.4% more expensive than Logan. The overall cost index is 96.3 vs 95.9 (national average = 100).

What salary in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin equals $100K in Logan?

A $100,000 salary in Logan has the same purchasing power as $100,428 in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Logan and Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin?

Rents in Logan are indexed at 91.0 while Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin is at 104.6 (national average = 100). Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.