Naples-Marco Island vs Providence-Warwick

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Providence-Warwick is 1.4% less expensive than Naples-Marco Island.

1.4% less expensive

Providence-Warwick, RI-MA is 1.4% less expensive than Naples-Marco Island, FL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 101.8 vs 103.2). A $100,000 salary in Naples-Marco Island buys about the same as $98,617 in Providence-Warwick; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 103.2 (Naples-Marco Island) vs 101.8 (Providence-Warwick)
  • $100k in Naples-Marco Island ≈ $98,617 purchasing power in Providence-Warwick
  • Services drives the gap (+61.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair FL:RI 103.2→101.8

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE FL × RI
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Naples-Marco Island
103.2
Cost Index
Providence-Warwick
101.8
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Naples-Marco Island, FL and Providence-Warwick, RI-MA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Providence-Warwick is 61.0 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Naples-Marco Island to $98,617 in Providence-Warwick, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Naples-Marco Island
103.2
Providence-Warwick
101.8
Goods
Naples-Marco Island
96.2
Providence-Warwick
97.1
Services
Naples-Marco Island
87.8
Providence-Warwick
148.8
Rents
Naples-Marco Island
129.4
Providence-Warwick
103.9

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Naples-Marco Island would need to be in Providence-Warwick for the same purchasing power:

In Naples-Marco Island In Providence-Warwick Difference
$50,000 $49,309 $-691
$75,000 $73,963 $-1,037
$100,000 $98,617 $-1,383
$150,000 $147,926 $-2,074
$ in Naples-Marco Island = in Providence-Warwick

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.2 → 101.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Providence-Warwick more expensive than Naples-Marco Island?

Providence-Warwick is 1.4% less expensive than Naples-Marco Island. The overall cost index is 101.8 vs 103.2 (national average = 100).

What salary in Providence-Warwick equals $100K in Naples-Marco Island?

A $100,000 salary in Naples-Marco Island has the same purchasing power as $98,617 in Providence-Warwick. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Naples-Marco Island and Providence-Warwick?

Rents in Naples-Marco Island are indexed at 129.4 while Providence-Warwick is at 103.9 (national average = 100). Naples-Marco Island has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.