Naples-Marco Island vs Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard is 2.3% more expensive than Naples-Marco Island.

2.3% more expensive

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA is 2.3% more expensive than Naples-Marco Island, FL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 105.6 vs 103.2). A $100,000 salary in Naples-Marco Island buys about the same as $102,332 in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 103.2 (Naples-Marco Island) vs 105.6 (Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard)
  • $100k in Naples-Marco Island ≈ $102,332 purchasing power in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
  • Goods drives the gap (+8.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair FL:WA 103.2→105.6

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · GOODS-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE FL × WA
  • GOODS-LED Goods-led gap
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA is 2.3% more expensive than Naples-Marco Island, FL, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.4-point overall gap.

Goods leads the difference, with Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard 8.8 points higher than Naples-Marco Island. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $102,332 in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Naples-Marco Island, then replace the national basket with your own.

Naples-Marco Island
103.2
Cost Index
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
105.6
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Naples-Marco Island
103.2
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
105.6
Goods
Naples-Marco Island
96.2
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
105.0
Services
Naples-Marco Island
87.8
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
92.0
Rents
Naples-Marco Island
129.4
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard
129.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Naples-Marco Island would need to be in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard for the same purchasing power:

In Naples-Marco Island In Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard Difference
$50,000 $51,166 +$1,166
$75,000 $76,749 +$1,749
$100,000 $102,332 +$2,332
$150,000 $153,499 +$3,499
$ in Naples-Marco Island = in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.2 → 105.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard more expensive than Naples-Marco Island?

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard is 2.3% more expensive than Naples-Marco Island. The overall cost index is 105.6 vs 103.2 (national average = 100).

What salary in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard equals $100K in Naples-Marco Island?

A $100,000 salary in Naples-Marco Island has the same purchasing power as $102,332 in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Naples-Marco Island and Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard?

Rents in Naples-Marco Island are indexed at 129.4 while Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard is at 129.6 (national average = 100). Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.