Overall
Diff +1.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Merced is 1.9% more expensive than Missoula.
Merced, CA is 1.9% more expensive than Missoula, MT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 96.4). A $100,000 salary in Missoula buys about the same as $101,897 in Merced; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MT:CA 96.4→98.3
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Missoula, MT and Merced, CA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.8 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Merced is 86.3 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Missoula to $101,897 in Merced, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +1.8 RPP
Diff +9.2 RPP
Diff +86.3 RPP
Diff -16.3 RPP
| Category | Missoula | Merced | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.4 | 98.3 | +1.8 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 105.2 | +9.2 |
| Services | 72.1 | 158.3 | +86.3 |
| Rents | 94.9 | 78.6 | -16.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Missoula and Merced share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.7 to 1.8 RPP points. Merced remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 59.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (26.7 to 86.3 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Missoula RPP | Merced RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 98.0 | 94.3 | 3.7 points Missoula higher |
| 2012 | 93.9 | 98.6 | 4.7 points Merced higher |
| 2016 | 95.8 | 95.3 | 0.5 points Missoula higher |
| 2020 | 93.9 | 98.7 | 4.8 points Merced higher |
| 2024 | 96.4 | 98.3 | 1.8 points Merced higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Missoula would need to be in Merced for the same purchasing power:
| In Missoula | In Merced | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,949 | +$949 |
| $75,000 | $76,423 | +$1,423 |
| $100,000 | $101,897 | +$1,897 |
| $150,000 | $152,846 | +$2,846 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.4 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Merced is 1.9% more expensive than Missoula. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 96.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Missoula has the same purchasing power as $101,897 in Merced. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Missoula are indexed at 94.9 while Merced is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Missoula has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.