Overall
- Missoula
- 96.4
- Coeur d'Alene
- 98.3
Diff +1.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Coeur d'Alene is 1.9% more expensive than Missoula.
Coeur d'Alene, ID is 1.9% more expensive than Missoula, MT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 96.4). A $100,000 salary in Missoula buys about the same as $101,916 in Coeur d'Alene; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair MT:ID 96.4→98.3
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Missoula, MT and Coeur d'Alene, ID are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.8 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Coeur d'Alene is 10.7 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Missoula corresponds to $101,916 in Coeur d'Alene.
Diff +1.8 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -1.3 RPP
Diff +10.7 RPP
| Category | Missoula | Coeur d'Alene | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.4 | 98.3 | +1.8 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 96.2 | +0.2 |
| Services | 72.1 | 70.8 | -1.3 |
| Rents | 94.9 | 105.6 | +10.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Missoula and Coeur d'Alene share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 0.2 to 1.8 RPP points. Coeur d'Alene remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 10.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (11.7 to 1.3 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Missoula RPP | Coeur d'Alene RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 98.0 | 98.1 | 0.2 points Coeur d'Alene higher |
| 2012 | 93.9 | 94.9 | 1.0 points Coeur d'Alene higher |
| 2016 | 95.8 | 97.5 | 1.7 points Coeur d'Alene higher |
| 2020 | 93.9 | 93.0 | 0.9 points Missoula higher |
| 2024 | 96.4 | 98.3 | 1.8 points Coeur d'Alene higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Missoula would need to be in Coeur d'Alene for the same purchasing power:
| In Missoula | In Coeur d'Alene | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,958 | +$958 |
| $75,000 | $76,437 | +$1,437 |
| $100,000 | $101,916 | +$1,916 |
| $150,000 | $152,874 | +$2,874 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.4 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Coeur d'Alene is 1.9% more expensive than Missoula. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 96.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Missoula has the same purchasing power as $101,916 in Coeur d'Alene. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Missoula are indexed at 94.9 while Coeur d'Alene is at 105.6 (national average = 100). Coeur d'Alene has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.