Overall
Diff +0.0 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Cheyenne is 0% more expensive than Missoula.
Cheyenne, WY is 0% more expensive than Missoula, MT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.5 vs 96.4). A $100,000 salary in Missoula buys about the same as $100,048 in Cheyenne; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MT:WY 96.4→96.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Missoula, MT and Cheyenne, WY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Cheyenne is 5.9 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Missoula to $100,048 in Cheyenne, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.0 RPP
Diff -0.6 RPP
Diff +5.9 RPP
Diff -5.1 RPP
| Category | Missoula | Cheyenne | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.4 | 96.5 | +0.0 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 95.4 | -0.6 |
| Services | 72.1 | 78.0 | +5.9 |
| Rents | 94.9 | 89.8 | -5.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Missoula and Cheyenne share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 2.4 to 0.0 RPP points. Cheyenne remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 11.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (6.0 to 5.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Missoula RPP | Cheyenne RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 98.0 | 95.6 | 2.4 points Missoula higher |
| 2012 | 93.9 | 99.2 | 5.3 points Cheyenne higher |
| 2016 | 95.8 | 97.9 | 2.1 points Cheyenne higher |
| 2020 | 93.9 | 91.8 | 2.1 points Missoula higher |
| 2024 | 96.4 | 96.5 | 0.0 points Cheyenne higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Missoula would need to be in Cheyenne for the same purchasing power:
| In Missoula | In Cheyenne | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,024 | +$24 |
| $75,000 | $75,036 | +$36 |
| $100,000 | $100,048 | +$48 |
| $150,000 | $150,072 | +$72 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.4 → 96.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Cheyenne is 0% more expensive than Missoula. The overall cost index is 96.5 vs 96.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Missoula has the same purchasing power as $100,048 in Cheyenne. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Missoula are indexed at 94.9 while Cheyenne is at 89.8 (national average = 100). Missoula has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.