Missoula vs Buffalo-Cheektowaga

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Buffalo-Cheektowaga is 0.6% less expensive than Missoula.

0.6% less expensive

Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY is 0.6% less expensive than Missoula, MT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.8 vs 96.4). A $100,000 salary in Missoula buys about the same as $99,377 in Buffalo-Cheektowaga; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 96.4 (Missoula) vs 95.8 (Buffalo-Cheektowaga)
  • $100k in Missoula ≈ $99,377 purchasing power in Buffalo-Cheektowaga
  • Services drives the gap (+57.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MT:NY 96.4→95.8

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MT × NY
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Missoula
96.4
Cost Index
Buffalo-Cheektowaga
95.8
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Missoula, MT and Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Buffalo-Cheektowaga is 57.4 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Missoula to $99,377 in Buffalo-Cheektowaga, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Missoula
96.4
Buffalo-Cheektowaga
95.8
Goods
Missoula
96.0
Buffalo-Cheektowaga
99.7
Services
Missoula
72.1
Buffalo-Cheektowaga
129.5
Rents
Missoula
94.9
Buffalo-Cheektowaga
81.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Missoula would need to be in Buffalo-Cheektowaga for the same purchasing power:

In Missoula In Buffalo-Cheektowaga Difference
$50,000 $49,688 $-312
$75,000 $74,533 $-467
$100,000 $99,377 $-623
$150,000 $149,065 $-935
$ in Missoula = in Buffalo-Cheektowaga

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.4 → 95.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Buffalo-Cheektowaga more expensive than Missoula?

Buffalo-Cheektowaga is 0.6% less expensive than Missoula. The overall cost index is 95.8 vs 96.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Buffalo-Cheektowaga equals $100K in Missoula?

A $100,000 salary in Missoula has the same purchasing power as $99,377 in Buffalo-Cheektowaga. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Missoula and Buffalo-Cheektowaga?

Rents in Missoula are indexed at 94.9 while Buffalo-Cheektowaga is at 81.0 (national average = 100). Missoula has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.