Overall
Diff -0.5 RPP
Missoula vs Logan
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Logan is 0.5% less expensive than Missoula.
0.5% less expensive
Logan, UT-ID is 0.5% less expensive than Missoula, MT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.9 vs 96.4). A $100,000 salary in Missoula buys about the same as $99,463 in Logan; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 96.4 (Missoula) vs 95.9 (Logan)
- $100k in Missoula ≈ $99,463 purchasing power in Logan
- Services drives the gap (+5.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair MT:UT 96.4→95.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE MT × UT
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Missoula
96.4
Cost Index
Logan
95.9
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Missoula, MT and Logan, UT-ID are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Logan is 5.8 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Missoula to $99,463 in Logan, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +0.4 RPP
Services
Diff +5.8 RPP
Rents
Diff -4.0 RPP
| Category | Missoula | Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.4 | 95.9 | -0.5 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 96.4 | +0.4 |
| Services | 72.1 | 77.9 | +5.8 |
| Rents | 94.9 | 91.0 | -4.0 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Missoula 96.4
Logan 95.9
Goods
Missoula 96.0
Logan 96.4
Services
Missoula 72.1
Logan 77.9
Rents
Missoula 94.9
Logan 91.0
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Missoula would need to be in Logan for the same purchasing power:
| In Missoula | In Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,731 | $-269 |
| $75,000 | $74,597 | $-403 |
| $100,000 | $99,463 | $-537 |
| $150,000 | $149,194 | $-806 |
$ in Missoula = in Logan
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.4 → 95.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Logan more expensive than Missoula?
Logan is 0.5% less expensive than Missoula. The overall cost index is 95.9 vs 96.4 (national average = 100).
What salary in Logan equals $100K in Missoula?
A $100,000 salary in Missoula has the same purchasing power as $99,463 in Logan. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Missoula and Logan?
Rents in Missoula are indexed at 94.9 while Logan is at 91.0 (national average = 100). Missoula has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.