Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington vs Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom is 1.8% more expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington.

1.8% more expensive

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA is 1.8% more expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 106.7 vs 104.8). A $100,000 salary in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington buys about the same as $101,763 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 104.8 (Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington) vs 106.7 (Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom)
  • $100k in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington ≈ $101,763 purchasing power in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
  • Services drives the gap (+57.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MN:CA 104.8→106.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MN × CA
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
104.8
Cost Index
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
106.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI and Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.8 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services leads the difference, with Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom 57.8 points higher than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington to $101,763 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
104.8
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
106.7
Goods
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
103.1
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
105.2
Services
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
93.5
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
151.3
Rents
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
111.8
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
130.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington would need to be in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom for the same purchasing power:

In Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington In Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom Difference
$50,000 $50,881 +$881
$75,000 $76,322 +$1,322
$100,000 $101,763 +$1,763
$150,000 $152,644 +$2,644
$ in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington = in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (104.8 → 106.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom more expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington?

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom is 1.8% more expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington. The overall cost index is 106.7 vs 104.8 (national average = 100).

What salary in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom equals $100K in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington?

A $100,000 salary in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington has the same purchasing power as $101,763 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington and Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom?

Rents in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington are indexed at 111.8 while Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom is at 130.2 (national average = 100). Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.