Overall
- Logan
- 95.9
Diff +2.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Prescott Valley-Prescott is 2.4% more expensive than Logan.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 2.4% more expensive than Logan, UT-ID on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 95.9). A $100,000 salary in Logan buys about the same as $102,427 in Prescott Valley-Prescott; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair UT:AZ 95.9→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +2.3 RPP
Diff -0.2 RPP
Diff +13.6 RPP
Diff +7.8 RPP
| Category | Logan | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.9 | 98.3 | +2.3 |
| Goods | 96.4 | 96.2 | -0.2 |
| Services | 77.9 | 91.5 | +13.6 |
| Rents | 91.0 | 98.8 | +7.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Prescott Valley-Prescott is 13.6 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 2.4% more expensive than Logan, UT-ID, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.3-point overall gap.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Logan to $102,427 in Prescott Valley-Prescott, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Logan would need to be in Prescott Valley-Prescott for the same purchasing power:
| In Logan | In Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,213 | +$1,213 |
| $75,000 | $76,820 | +$1,820 |
| $100,000 | $102,427 | +$2,427 |
| $150,000 | $153,640 | +$3,640 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.9 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Logan and Prescott Valley-Prescott share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 7.2 to 2.3 RPP points. Prescott Valley-Prescott remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 28.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (35.8 to 7.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Logan RPP | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.8 | 103.0 | 7.2 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2012 | 92.5 | 96.5 | 4.0 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2016 | 94.7 | 98.6 | 3.9 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2020 | 91.3 | 93.2 | 1.9 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2024 | 95.9 | 98.3 | 2.3 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Prescott Valley-Prescott is 2.4% more expensive than Logan. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 95.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Logan has the same purchasing power as $102,427 in Prescott Valley-Prescott. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Logan are indexed at 91.0 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is at 98.8 (national average = 100). Prescott Valley-Prescott has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.