Overall
- Logan
- 95.9
Diff -2.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Logan is 2.4% less expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott.
Logan, UT-ID is 2.4% less expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.9 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott buys about the same as $97,631 in Logan; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:UT 98.3→95.9
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -2.3 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -13.6 RPP
Diff -7.8 RPP
| Category | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 95.9 | -2.3 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 96.4 | +0.2 |
| Services | 91.5 | 77.9 | -13.6 |
| Rents | 98.8 | 91.0 | -7.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Logan is 13.6 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Logan, UT-ID is 2.4% less expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.3-point overall gap.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Prescott Valley-Prescott to $97,631 in Logan, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott would need to be in Logan for the same purchasing power:
| In Prescott Valley-Prescott | In Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,815 | $-1,185 |
| $75,000 | $73,223 | $-1,777 |
| $100,000 | $97,631 | $-2,369 |
| $150,000 | $146,446 | $-3,554 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 95.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Prescott Valley-Prescott and Logan share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 7.2 to 2.3 RPP points. Prescott Valley-Prescott remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 28.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (35.8 to 7.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Logan RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 103.0 | 95.8 | 7.2 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2012 | 96.5 | 92.5 | 4.0 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2016 | 98.6 | 94.7 | 3.9 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2020 | 93.2 | 91.3 | 1.9 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 95.9 | 2.3 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Logan is 2.4% less expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott. The overall cost index is 95.9 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott has the same purchasing power as $97,631 in Logan. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Prescott Valley-Prescott are indexed at 98.8 while Logan is at 91.0 (national average = 100). Prescott Valley-Prescott has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.