Overall
- Lewiston-Auburn
- 94.7
Diff +3.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Prescott Valley-Prescott is 3.7% more expensive than Lewiston-Auburn.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 3.7% more expensive than Lewiston-Auburn, ME on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 94.7). A $100,000 salary in Lewiston-Auburn buys about the same as $103,715 in Prescott Valley-Prescott; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair ME:AZ 94.7→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +3.5 RPP
Diff -0.9 RPP
Diff -42.9 RPP
Diff +29.8 RPP
| Category | Lewiston-Auburn | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 94.7 | 98.3 | +3.5 |
| Goods | 97.2 | 96.2 | -0.9 |
| Services | 134.4 | 91.5 | -42.9 |
| Rents | 69.0 | 98.8 | +29.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Prescott Valley-Prescott is 42.9 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 3.7% more expensive than Lewiston-Auburn, ME, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.5-point overall gap.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Lewiston-Auburn to $103,715 in Prescott Valley-Prescott, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Lewiston-Auburn would need to be in Prescott Valley-Prescott for the same purchasing power:
| In Lewiston-Auburn | In Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,857 | +$1,857 |
| $75,000 | $77,786 | +$2,786 |
| $100,000 | $103,715 | +$3,715 |
| $150,000 | $155,572 | +$5,572 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.7 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lewiston-Auburn and Prescott Valley-Prescott share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.3 to 3.5 RPP points. Prescott Valley-Prescott remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 7.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (50.1 to 42.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Lewiston-Auburn RPP | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 97.7 | 103.0 | 5.3 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2012 | 98.8 | 96.5 | 2.2 points Lewiston-Auburn higher |
| 2016 | 96.6 | 98.6 | 2.0 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2020 | 99.7 | 93.2 | 6.5 points Lewiston-Auburn higher |
| 2024 | 94.7 | 98.3 | 3.5 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Prescott Valley-Prescott is 3.7% more expensive than Lewiston-Auburn. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 94.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Lewiston-Auburn has the same purchasing power as $103,715 in Prescott Valley-Prescott. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Lewiston-Auburn are indexed at 69.0 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is at 98.8 (national average = 100). Prescott Valley-Prescott has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.