Lewiston-Auburn vs Daphne-Fairhope-Foley

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is 0% less expensive than Lewiston-Auburn.

0% less expensive

Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL is 0% less expensive than Lewiston-Auburn, ME on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.7 vs 94.7). A $100,000 salary in Lewiston-Auburn buys about the same as $99,951 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 94.7 (Lewiston-Auburn) vs 94.7 (Daphne-Fairhope-Foley)
  • $100k in Lewiston-Auburn ≈ $99,951 purchasing power in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
  • Services drives the gap (-51.1 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair ME:AL 94.7→94.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE ME × AL
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Lewiston-Auburn
94.7
Cost Index
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
94.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Lewiston-Auburn, ME and Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is 51.1 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Lewiston-Auburn to $99,951 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Lewiston-Auburn
94.7
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
94.7
Goods
Lewiston-Auburn
97.2
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
96.4
Services
Lewiston-Auburn
134.4
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
83.3
Rents
Lewiston-Auburn
69.0
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
89.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Lewiston-Auburn would need to be in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley for the same purchasing power:

In Lewiston-Auburn In Daphne-Fairhope-Foley Difference
$50,000 $49,976 $-24
$75,000 $74,964 $-36
$100,000 $99,951 $-49
$150,000 $149,927 $-73
$ in Lewiston-Auburn = in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.7 → 94.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Daphne-Fairhope-Foley more expensive than Lewiston-Auburn?

Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is 0% less expensive than Lewiston-Auburn. The overall cost index is 94.7 vs 94.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley equals $100K in Lewiston-Auburn?

A $100,000 salary in Lewiston-Auburn has the same purchasing power as $99,951 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Lewiston-Auburn and Daphne-Fairhope-Foley?

Rents in Lewiston-Auburn are indexed at 69.0 while Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is at 89.2 (national average = 100). Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.