Lewiston-Auburn vs San Antonio-New Braunfels

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. San Antonio-New Braunfels is 0% less expensive than Lewiston-Auburn.

0% less expensive

San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX is 0% less expensive than Lewiston-Auburn, ME on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.7 vs 94.7). A $100,000 salary in Lewiston-Auburn buys about the same as $99,979 in San Antonio-New Braunfels; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 94.7 (Lewiston-Auburn) vs 94.7 (San Antonio-New Braunfels)
  • $100k in Lewiston-Auburn ≈ $99,979 purchasing power in San Antonio-New Braunfels
  • Services drives the gap (-52.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair ME:TX 94.7→94.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE ME × TX
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Lewiston-Auburn
94.7
Cost Index
San Antonio-New Braunfels
94.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Lewiston-Auburn, ME and San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: San Antonio-New Braunfels is 52.2 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Lewiston-Auburn to $99,979 in San Antonio-New Braunfels, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Lewiston-Auburn
94.7
San Antonio-New Braunfels
94.7
Goods
Lewiston-Auburn
97.2
San Antonio-New Braunfels
93.8
Services
Lewiston-Auburn
134.4
San Antonio-New Braunfels
82.2
Rents
Lewiston-Auburn
69.0
San Antonio-New Braunfels
94.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Lewiston-Auburn would need to be in San Antonio-New Braunfels for the same purchasing power:

In Lewiston-Auburn In San Antonio-New Braunfels Difference
$50,000 $49,989 $-11
$75,000 $74,984 $-16
$100,000 $99,979 $-21
$150,000 $149,968 $-32
$ in Lewiston-Auburn = in San Antonio-New Braunfels

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.7 → 94.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is San Antonio-New Braunfels more expensive than Lewiston-Auburn?

San Antonio-New Braunfels is 0% less expensive than Lewiston-Auburn. The overall cost index is 94.7 vs 94.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in San Antonio-New Braunfels equals $100K in Lewiston-Auburn?

A $100,000 salary in Lewiston-Auburn has the same purchasing power as $99,979 in San Antonio-New Braunfels. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Lewiston-Auburn and San Antonio-New Braunfels?

Rents in Lewiston-Auburn are indexed at 69.0 while San Antonio-New Braunfels is at 94.6 (national average = 100). San Antonio-New Braunfels has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.