Overall
- Jackson
- 85.5
- Fort Smith
- 85.9
Diff +0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Fort Smith is 0.4% more expensive than Jackson.
Fort Smith, AR-OK is 0.4% more expensive than Jackson, TN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 85.9 vs 85.5). A $100,000 salary in Jackson buys about the same as $100,428 in Fort Smith; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair TN:AR 85.5→85.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Jackson, TN and Fort Smith, AR-OK are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Fort Smith is 3.1 points lower. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Jackson corresponds to $100,428 in Fort Smith.
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff -2.6 RPP
Diff +1.2 RPP
Diff -3.1 RPP
| Category | Jackson | Fort Smith | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 85.5 | 85.9 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 93.6 | -2.6 |
| Services | 72.6 | 73.8 | +1.2 |
| Rents | 56.6 | 53.4 | -3.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Jackson and Fort Smith share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.5 to 0.4 RPP points. Fort Smith remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 10.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (7.2 to 3.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Jackson RPP | Fort Smith RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 86.1 | 90.7 | 4.5 points Fort Smith higher |
| 2012 | 87.6 | 89.8 | 2.2 points Fort Smith higher |
| 2016 | 85.9 | 89.3 | 3.3 points Fort Smith higher |
| 2020 | 83.8 | 87.1 | 3.3 points Fort Smith higher |
| 2024 | 85.5 | 85.9 | 0.4 points Fort Smith higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Jackson would need to be in Fort Smith for the same purchasing power:
| In Jackson | In Fort Smith | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,214 | +$214 |
| $75,000 | $75,321 | +$321 |
| $100,000 | $100,428 | +$428 |
| $150,000 | $150,642 | +$642 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (85.5 → 85.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Fort Smith is 0.4% more expensive than Jackson. The overall cost index is 85.9 vs 85.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Jackson has the same purchasing power as $100,428 in Fort Smith. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Jackson are indexed at 56.6 while Fort Smith is at 53.4 (national average = 100). Jackson has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.