Overall
Diff +0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Jonesboro is 0.4% more expensive than Jackson.
Jonesboro, AR is 0.4% more expensive than Jackson, TN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 85.9 vs 85.5). A $100,000 salary in Jackson buys about the same as $100,414 in Jonesboro; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair TN:AR 85.5→85.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Jackson, TN and Jonesboro, AR are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Jonesboro is 2.7 points lower. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Jackson corresponds to $100,414 in Jonesboro.
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff -2.7 RPP
Diff +2.4 RPP
Diff -2.7 RPP
| Category | Jackson | Jonesboro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 85.5 | 85.9 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 93.6 | -2.7 |
| Services | 72.6 | 75.0 | +2.4 |
| Rents | 56.6 | 53.8 | -2.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Jackson and Jonesboro share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.9 to 0.4 RPP points. Jonesboro remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 3.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (6.6 to 2.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Jackson RPP | Jonesboro RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 86.1 | 84.2 | 1.9 points Jackson higher |
| 2012 | 87.6 | 85.8 | 1.8 points Jackson higher |
| 2016 | 85.9 | 84.8 | 1.2 points Jackson higher |
| 2020 | 83.8 | 85.5 | 1.7 points Jonesboro higher |
| 2024 | 85.5 | 85.9 | 0.4 points Jonesboro higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Jackson would need to be in Jonesboro for the same purchasing power:
| In Jackson | In Jonesboro | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,207 | +$207 |
| $75,000 | $75,310 | +$310 |
| $100,000 | $100,414 | +$414 |
| $150,000 | $150,621 | +$621 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (85.5 → 85.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Jonesboro is 0.4% more expensive than Jackson. The overall cost index is 85.9 vs 85.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Jackson has the same purchasing power as $100,414 in Jonesboro. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Jackson are indexed at 56.6 while Jonesboro is at 53.8 (national average = 100). Jackson has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.