Daphne-Fairhope-Foley vs Washington-Arlington-Alexandria

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria is 15% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL at an overall Regional Price Parity of 94.7 and Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV at 108.9, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Washington-Arlington-Alexandria 15% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 14.2 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Daphne-Fairhope-Foley indexes goods at 96.4, services at 83.3, and rents at 89.2, while Washington-Arlington-Alexandria comes in at 104.8, 106.7, and 151.1 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall - Washington-Arlington-Alexandria carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has the same purchasing power as $114,990 in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 239,945 (Daphne-Fairhope-Foley) and 6,263,796 (Washington-Arlington-Alexandria), and median household incomes are $75,019 versus $123,896 respectively - so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
94.7
Cost Index
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
108.9
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Daphne-Fairhope-Foley Washington-Arlington-Alexandria Difference
Overall 94.7 108.9 +14.2
Goods 96.4 104.8 +8.4
Services 83.3 106.7 +23.4
Rents 89.2 151.1 +62.0

Visual Comparison

Overall
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
94.7
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
108.9
Goods
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
96.4
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
104.8
Services
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
83.3
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
106.7
Rents
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
89.2
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
151.1

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley would need to be in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria for the same purchasing power:

In Daphne-Fairhope-Foley In Washington-Arlington-Alexandria Difference
$50,000 $57,495 +$7,495
$75,000 $86,242 +$11,242
$100,000 $114,990 +$14,990
$150,000 $172,485 +$22,485

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Daphne-Fairhope-Foley Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
Population 239,945 6,263,796
Median Income $75,019 $123,896
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Washington-Arlington-Alexandria more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley?
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria is 15% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley. The overall cost index is 108.9 vs 94.7 (national average = 100).
What salary in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria equals $100K in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley?
A $100,000 salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has the same purchasing power as $114,990 in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Daphne-Fairhope-Foley and Washington-Arlington-Alexandria?
Rents in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley are indexed at 89.2 while Washington-Arlington-Alexandria is at 151.1 (national average = 100). Washington-Arlington-Alexandria has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial