Daphne-Fairhope-Foley vs Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell is 5.7% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL at an overall Regional Price Parity of 94.7 and Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA at 100.1, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell 5.7% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 5.4 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Daphne-Fairhope-Foley indexes goods at 96.4, services at 83.3, and rents at 89.2, while Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell comes in at 100.4, 96.2, and 111.0 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall - Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has the same purchasing power as $105,669 in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 239,945 (Daphne-Fairhope-Foley) and 6,176,937 (Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell), and median household incomes are $75,019 versus $86,338 respectively - so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
94.7
Cost Index
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.1
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Daphne-Fairhope-Foley Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell Difference
Overall 94.7 100.1 +5.4
Goods 96.4 100.4 +4.0
Services 83.3 96.2 +13.0
Rents 89.2 111.0 +21.9

Visual Comparison

Overall
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
94.7
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.1
Goods
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
96.4
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
100.4
Services
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
83.3
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
96.2
Rents
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
89.2
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
111.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley would need to be in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell for the same purchasing power:

In Daphne-Fairhope-Foley In Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell Difference
$50,000 $52,835 +$2,835
$75,000 $79,252 +$4,252
$100,000 $105,669 +$5,669
$150,000 $158,504 +$8,504

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Daphne-Fairhope-Foley Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell
Population 239,945 6,176,937
Median Income $75,019 $86,338
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley?
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell is 5.7% more expensive than Daphne-Fairhope-Foley. The overall cost index is 100.1 vs 94.7 (national average = 100).
What salary in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell equals $100K in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley?
A $100,000 salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has the same purchasing power as $105,669 in Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Daphne-Fairhope-Foley and Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell?
Rents in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley are indexed at 89.2 while Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell is at 111.0 (national average = 100). Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial