Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington vs Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia is 5.6% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX at an overall Regional Price Parity of 103.1 and Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC at 97.3, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia 5.6% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 5.7 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington indexes goods at 102.8, services at 90.7, and rents at 117.9, while Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia comes in at 96.6, 89.2, and 97.6 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall - Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has the same purchasing power as $94,430 in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 7,807,555 (Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington) and 2,712,818 (Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia), and median household incomes are $87,155 versus $80,201 respectively - so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Cost Index
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
97.3
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia Difference
Overall 103.1 97.3 -5.7
Goods 102.8 96.6 -6.3
Services 90.7 89.2 -1.5
Rents 117.9 97.6 -20.2

Visual Comparison

Overall
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
97.3
Goods
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
102.8
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
96.6
Services
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
90.7
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
89.2
Rents
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
117.9
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
97.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington would need to be in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia for the same purchasing power:

In Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington In Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia Difference
$50,000 $47,215 $-2,785
$75,000 $70,823 $-4,177
$100,000 $94,430 $-5,570
$150,000 $141,645 $-8,355

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
Population 7,807,555 2,712,818
Median Income $87,155 $80,201
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia more expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington?
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia is 5.6% less expensive than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. The overall cost index is 97.3 vs 103.1 (national average = 100).
What salary in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia equals $100K in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington?
A $100,000 salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has the same purchasing power as $94,430 in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington and Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia?
Rents in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington are indexed at 117.9 while Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia is at 97.6 (national average = 100). Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial