Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia vs Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is 5.9% more expensive than Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC at an overall Regional Price Parity of 97.3 and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX at 103.1, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 5.9% more expensive than Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 5.7 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia indexes goods at 96.6, services at 89.2, and rents at 97.6, while Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington comes in at 102.8, 90.7, and 117.9 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall - Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia has the same purchasing power as $105,898 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 2,712,818 (Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia) and 7,807,555 (Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington), and median household incomes are $80,201 versus $87,155 respectively - so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
97.3
Cost Index
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Difference
Overall 97.3 103.1 +5.7
Goods 96.6 102.8 +6.3
Services 89.2 90.7 +1.5
Rents 97.6 117.9 +20.2

Visual Comparison

Overall
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
97.3
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Goods
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
96.6
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
102.8
Services
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
89.2
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
90.7
Rents
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
97.6
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
117.9

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia would need to be in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington for the same purchasing power:

In Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia In Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Difference
$50,000 $52,949 +$2,949
$75,000 $79,424 +$4,424
$100,000 $105,898 +$5,898
$150,000 $158,848 +$8,848

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
Population 2,712,818 7,807,555
Median Income $80,201 $87,155
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington more expensive than Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia?
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is 5.9% more expensive than Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia. The overall cost index is 103.1 vs 97.3 (national average = 100).
What salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington equals $100K in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia?
A $100,000 salary in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia has the same purchasing power as $105,898 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington?
Rents in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia are indexed at 97.6 while Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is at 117.9 (national average = 100). Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial