Coeur d'Alene vs Yuma

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yuma is 5.7% less expensive than Coeur d'Alene.

5.7% less expensive

Yuma, AZ is 5.7% less expensive than Coeur d'Alene, ID on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Coeur d'Alene buys about the same as $94,316 in Yuma; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 98.3 (Coeur d'Alene) vs 92.7 (Yuma)
  • $100k in Coeur d'Alene ≈ $94,316 purchasing power in Yuma
  • Rents drives the gap (-31.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair ID:AZ 98.3→92.7

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE ID × AZ
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Coeur d'Alene
98.3
Yuma
92.7
Goods
Coeur d'Alene
96.2
Yuma
96.2
Services
Coeur d'Alene
70.8
Yuma
87.8
Rents
Coeur d'Alene
105.6
Yuma
73.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rents creates the largest separation: Yuma is 31.8 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Yuma, AZ is 5.7% less expensive than Coeur d'Alene, ID, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.6-point overall gap.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Coeur d'Alene corresponds to $94,316 in Yuma.

Coeur d'Alene
98.3
Cost Index
Yuma
92.7
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Coeur d'Alene would need to be in Yuma for the same purchasing power:

In Coeur d'Alene In Yuma Difference
$50,000 $47,158 $-2,842
$75,000 $70,737 $-4,263
$100,000 $94,316 $-5,684
$150,000 $141,474 $-8,526
$ in Coeur d'Alene = in Yuma

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

How the Price Gap Changed

Coeur d'Alene and Yuma share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 5.7 to 5.6 RPP points. Coeur d'Alene remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 17.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (14.5 to 31.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Coeur d'Alene RPP Yuma RPP Relative Gap
2008 98.1 92.4 5.7 points Coeur d'Alene higher
2012 94.9 93.8 1.0 points Coeur d'Alene higher
2016 97.5 92.7 4.8 points Coeur d'Alene higher
2020 93.0 88.7 4.4 points Coeur d'Alene higher
2024 98.3 92.7 5.6 points Coeur d'Alene higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yuma more expensive than Coeur d'Alene?

Yuma is 5.7% less expensive than Coeur d'Alene. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).

What salary in Yuma equals $100K in Coeur d'Alene?

A $100,000 salary in Coeur d'Alene has the same purchasing power as $94,316 in Yuma. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Coeur d'Alene and Yuma?

Rents in Coeur d'Alene are indexed at 105.6 while Yuma is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Coeur d'Alene has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.