Yuma vs Coeur d'Alene

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Coeur d'Alene is 6% more expensive than Yuma.

6% more expensive

Coeur d'Alene, ID is 6% more expensive than Yuma, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Yuma buys about the same as $106,027 in Coeur d'Alene; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 92.7 (Yuma) vs 98.3 (Coeur d'Alene)
  • $100k in Yuma ≈ $106,027 purchasing power in Coeur d'Alene
  • Rents drives the gap (+31.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AZ:ID 92.7→98.3

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE AZ × ID
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Yuma
92.7
Coeur d'Alene
98.3
Goods
Yuma
96.2
Coeur d'Alene
96.2
Services
Yuma
87.8
Coeur d'Alene
70.8
Rents
Yuma
73.8
Coeur d'Alene
105.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rents creates the largest separation: Coeur d'Alene is 31.8 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Coeur d'Alene, ID is 6% more expensive than Yuma, AZ, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.6-point overall gap.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Yuma corresponds to $106,027 in Coeur d'Alene.

Yuma
92.7
Cost Index
Coeur d'Alene
98.3
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Yuma would need to be in Coeur d'Alene for the same purchasing power:

In Yuma In Coeur d'Alene Difference
$50,000 $53,013 +$3,013
$75,000 $79,520 +$4,520
$100,000 $106,027 +$6,027
$150,000 $159,040 +$9,040
$ in Yuma = in Coeur d'Alene

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

How the Price Gap Changed

Yuma and Coeur d'Alene share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 5.7 to 5.6 RPP points. Coeur d'Alene remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 17.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (14.5 to 31.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Yuma RPP Coeur d'Alene RPP Relative Gap
2008 92.4 98.1 5.7 points Coeur d'Alene higher
2012 93.8 94.9 1.0 points Coeur d'Alene higher
2016 92.7 97.5 4.8 points Coeur d'Alene higher
2020 88.7 93.0 4.4 points Coeur d'Alene higher
2024 92.7 98.3 5.6 points Coeur d'Alene higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Coeur d'Alene more expensive than Yuma?

Coeur d'Alene is 6% more expensive than Yuma. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Coeur d'Alene equals $100K in Yuma?

A $100,000 salary in Yuma has the same purchasing power as $106,027 in Coeur d'Alene. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Yuma and Coeur d'Alene?

Rents in Yuma are indexed at 73.8 while Coeur d'Alene is at 105.6 (national average = 100). Coeur d'Alene has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.