Chicago-Naperville-Elgin vs Rochester

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rochester is 12.3% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.

12.3% less expensive

Rochester, MN is 12.3% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.8 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $87,669 in Rochester; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin) vs 90.8 (Rochester)
  • $100k in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin ≈ $87,669 purchasing power in Rochester
  • Rents drives the gap (-33.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:MN 103.6→90.8

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE IL × MN
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Rochester
90.8
Goods
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
Rochester
95.4
Services
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
Rochester
87.4
Rents
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0
Rochester
78.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rents creates the largest separation: Rochester is 33.4 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN and Rochester, MN sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 12.8 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is above 100 while Rochester is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin corresponds to $87,669 in Rochester.

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
Rochester
90.8
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in Rochester for the same purchasing power:

In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin In Rochester Difference
$50,000 $43,835 $-6,165
$75,000 $65,752 $-9,248
$100,000 $87,669 $-12,331
$150,000 $131,504 $-18,496
$ in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin = in Rochester

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 90.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rochester more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

Rochester is 12.3% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 90.8 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Rochester equals $100K in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $87,669 in Rochester. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Rochester?

Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while Rochester is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.