Chicago-Naperville-Elgin vs Baton Rouge

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Baton Rouge is 12.4% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.

12.4% less expensive

Baton Rouge, LA is 12.4% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.8 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $87,630 in Baton Rouge; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin) vs 90.8 (Baton Rouge)
  • $100k in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin ≈ $87,630 purchasing power in Baton Rouge
  • Rents drives the gap (-37.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:LA 103.6→90.8

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE IL × LA
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in Baton Rouge for the same purchasing power:

In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin In Baton Rouge Difference
$50,000 $43,815 $-6,185
$75,000 $65,722 $-9,278
$100,000 $87,630 $-12,370
$150,000 $131,445 $-18,555
$ in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin = in Baton Rouge

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 90.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN and Baton Rouge, LA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 12.8 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is above 100 while Baton Rouge is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Rents leads the difference, with Baton Rouge 37.8 points lower than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin corresponds to $87,630 in Baton Rouge.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Baton Rouge
90.8
Goods
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
Baton Rouge
93.7
Services
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
Baton Rouge
71.2
Rents
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0
Baton Rouge
74.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
Baton Rouge
90.8
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Baton Rouge more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

Baton Rouge is 12.4% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 90.8 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Baton Rouge equals $100K in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $87,630 in Baton Rouge. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Baton Rouge?

Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while Baton Rouge is at 74.2 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.