Chicago-Naperville-Elgin vs North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota is 1.1% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.

1.1% less expensive

North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL is 1.1% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 102.4 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $98,863 in North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin) vs 102.4 (North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota)
  • $100k in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin ≈ $98,863 purchasing power in North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota
  • Rents drives the gap (+15.9 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:FL 103.6→102.4

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE IL × FL
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota
102.4
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN and North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota is 15.9 points higher. But rents and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin corresponds to $98,863 in North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota
102.4
Goods
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota
96.2
Services
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota
88.2
Rents
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0
North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota
128.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota for the same purchasing power:

In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin In North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota Difference
$50,000 $49,431 $-569
$75,000 $74,147 $-853
$100,000 $98,863 $-1,137
$150,000 $148,294 $-1,706
$ in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin = in North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 102.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota is 1.1% less expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 102.4 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota equals $100K in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $98,863 in North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota?

Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota is at 128.0 (national average = 100). North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.