Chicago-Naperville-Elgin vs Washington-Arlington-Alexandria

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria is 5.1% more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.

5.1% more expensive

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV is 5.1% more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 108.9 vs 103.6). A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin buys about the same as $105,105 in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin) vs 108.9 (Washington-Arlington-Alexandria)
  • $100k in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin ≈ $105,105 purchasing power in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
  • Rents drives the gap (+39.1 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair IL:DC 103.6→108.9

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE IL × DC
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
108.9
Goods
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
104.8
Services
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
106.7
Rents
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
151.1

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rents creates the largest separation: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria is 39.1 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV is 5.1% more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.3-point overall gap.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin corresponds to $105,105 in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria.

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria
108.9
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin would need to be in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria for the same purchasing power:

In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin In Washington-Arlington-Alexandria Difference
$50,000 $52,553 +$2,553
$75,000 $78,829 +$3,829
$100,000 $105,105 +$5,105
$150,000 $157,658 +$7,658
$ in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin = in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.6 → 108.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Washington-Arlington-Alexandria more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria is 5.1% more expensive than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. The overall cost index is 108.9 vs 103.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria equals $100K in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

A $100,000 salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the same purchasing power as $105,105 in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and Washington-Arlington-Alexandria?

Rents in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin are indexed at 112.0 while Washington-Arlington-Alexandria is at 151.1 (national average = 100). Washington-Arlington-Alexandria has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.