Overall
- Charlottesville
- 99.1
- Walla Walla
- 98.5
Diff -0.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Walla Walla is 0.6% less expensive than Charlottesville.
Walla Walla, WA is 0.6% less expensive than Charlottesville, VA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.5 vs 99.1). A $100,000 salary in Charlottesville buys about the same as $99,368 in Walla Walla; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair VA:WA 99.1→98.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Charlottesville, VA and Walla Walla, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Walla Walla is 20.5 points lower. But goods and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Charlottesville corresponds to $99,368 in Walla Walla.
Diff -0.6 RPP
Diff +8.3 RPP
Diff +5.3 RPP
Diff -20.5 RPP
| Category | Charlottesville | Walla Walla | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 99.1 | 98.5 | -0.6 |
| Goods | 96.8 | 105.0 | +8.3 |
| Services | 89.0 | 94.3 | +5.3 |
| Rents | 107.0 | 86.6 | -20.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Charlottesville would need to be in Walla Walla for the same purchasing power:
| In Charlottesville | In Walla Walla | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,684 | $-316 |
| $75,000 | $74,526 | $-474 |
| $100,000 | $99,368 | $-632 |
| $150,000 | $149,051 | $-949 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (99.1 → 98.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Walla Walla is 0.6% less expensive than Charlottesville. The overall cost index is 98.5 vs 99.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Charlottesville has the same purchasing power as $99,368 in Walla Walla. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Charlottesville are indexed at 107.0 while Walla Walla is at 86.6 (national average = 100). Charlottesville has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.