Overall
- Walla Walla
- 98.5
- Charlottesville
- 99.1
Diff +0.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Charlottesville is 0.6% more expensive than Walla Walla.
Charlottesville, VA is 0.6% more expensive than Walla Walla, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 99.1 vs 98.5). A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla buys about the same as $100,636 in Charlottesville; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:VA 98.5→99.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Walla Walla, WA and Charlottesville, VA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Charlottesville is 20.5 points higher. But goods and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Walla Walla corresponds to $100,636 in Charlottesville.
Diff +0.6 RPP
Diff -8.3 RPP
Diff -5.3 RPP
Diff +20.5 RPP
| Category | Walla Walla | Charlottesville | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.5 | 99.1 | +0.6 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.8 | -8.3 |
| Services | 94.3 | 89.0 | -5.3 |
| Rents | 86.6 | 107.0 | +20.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Walla Walla would need to be in Charlottesville for the same purchasing power:
| In Walla Walla | In Charlottesville | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,318 | +$318 |
| $75,000 | $75,477 | +$477 |
| $100,000 | $100,636 | +$636 |
| $150,000 | $150,955 | +$955 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.5 → 99.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Charlottesville is 0.6% more expensive than Walla Walla. The overall cost index is 99.1 vs 98.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla has the same purchasing power as $100,636 in Charlottesville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Walla Walla are indexed at 86.6 while Charlottesville is at 107.0 (national average = 100). Charlottesville has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.