Overall
- Bozeman
- 102.5
Diff -4.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Prescott Valley-Prescott is 4.2% less expensive than Bozeman.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 4.2% less expensive than Bozeman, MT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 102.5). A $100,000 salary in Bozeman buys about the same as $95,849 in Prescott Valley-Prescott; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair MT:AZ 102.5→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -4.3 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff +17.8 RPP
Diff -40.4 RPP
| Category | Bozeman | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 102.5 | 98.3 | -4.3 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 96.2 | +0.2 |
| Services | 73.6 | 91.5 | +17.8 |
| Rents | 139.2 | 98.8 | -40.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Prescott Valley-Prescott is 40.4 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 4.2% less expensive than Bozeman, MT, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.3-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Bozeman is above 100 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Bozeman corresponds to $95,849 in Prescott Valley-Prescott.
What a salary in Bozeman would need to be in Prescott Valley-Prescott for the same purchasing power:
| In Bozeman | In Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,925 | $-2,075 |
| $75,000 | $71,887 | $-3,113 |
| $100,000 | $95,849 | $-4,151 |
| $150,000 | $143,774 | $-6,226 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (102.5 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Bozeman and Prescott Valley-Prescott share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 4.2 to 4.3 RPP points. Bozeman remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 59.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (19.3 to 40.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Bozeman RPP | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 98.8 | 103.0 | 4.2 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2012 | 97.1 | 96.5 | 0.5 points Bozeman higher |
| 2016 | 97.5 | 98.6 | 1.2 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2020 | 96.5 | 93.2 | 3.3 points Bozeman higher |
| 2024 | 102.5 | 98.3 | 4.3 points Bozeman higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Prescott Valley-Prescott is 4.2% less expensive than Bozeman. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 102.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Bozeman has the same purchasing power as $95,849 in Prescott Valley-Prescott. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Bozeman are indexed at 139.2 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is at 98.8 (national average = 100). Bozeman has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.