Overall
Diff -4.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Merced is 4.1% less expensive than Bozeman.
Merced, CA is 4.1% less expensive than Bozeman, MT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 102.5). A $100,000 salary in Bozeman buys about the same as $95,869 in Merced; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MT:CA 102.5→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -4.2 RPP
Diff +9.2 RPP
Diff +84.7 RPP
Diff -60.6 RPP
| Category | Bozeman | Merced | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 102.5 | 98.3 | -4.2 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 105.2 | +9.2 |
| Services | 73.6 | 158.3 | +84.7 |
| Rents | 139.2 | 78.6 | -60.6 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Merced is 84.7 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Merced, CA is 4.1% less expensive than Bozeman, MT, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.2-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Bozeman is above 100 while Merced is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Bozeman to $95,869 in Merced, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Bozeman would need to be in Merced for the same purchasing power:
| In Bozeman | In Merced | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,934 | $-2,066 |
| $75,000 | $71,902 | $-3,098 |
| $100,000 | $95,869 | $-4,131 |
| $150,000 | $143,803 | $-6,197 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (102.5 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Bozeman and Merced share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 4.6 to 4.2 RPP points. Bozeman remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 57.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (27.1 to 84.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Bozeman RPP | Merced RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 98.8 | 94.3 | 4.6 points Bozeman higher |
| 2012 | 97.1 | 98.6 | 1.5 points Merced higher |
| 2016 | 97.5 | 95.3 | 2.1 points Bozeman higher |
| 2020 | 96.5 | 98.7 | 2.3 points Merced higher |
| 2024 | 102.5 | 98.3 | 4.2 points Bozeman higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Merced is 4.1% less expensive than Bozeman. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 102.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Bozeman has the same purchasing power as $95,869 in Merced. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Bozeman are indexed at 139.2 while Merced is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Bozeman has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.