Overall
- Boston-Cambridge-Newton
- 108.3
Diff -1.6 RPP
Boston-Cambridge-Newton vs Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom is 1.5% less expensive than Boston-Cambridge-Newton.
1.5% less expensive
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA is 1.5% less expensive than Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 106.7 vs 108.3). A $100,000 salary in Boston-Cambridge-Newton buys about the same as $98,526 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 108.3 (Boston-Cambridge-Newton) vs 106.7 (Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom)
- $100k in Boston-Cambridge-Newton ≈ $98,526 purchasing power in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
- Rents drives the gap (-18.2 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair MA:CA 108.3→106.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE MA × CA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
108.3
Cost Index
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
106.7
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH and Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom is 18.2 points lower. But goods and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Boston-Cambridge-Newton corresponds to $98,526 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +5.5 RPP
Services
- Boston-Cambridge-Newton
- 148.8
Diff +2.5 RPP
Rents
- Boston-Cambridge-Newton
- 148.4
Diff -18.2 RPP
| Category | Boston-Cambridge-Newton | Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 108.3 | 106.7 | -1.6 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 105.2 | +5.5 |
| Services | 148.8 | 151.3 | +2.5 |
| Rents | 148.4 | 130.2 | -18.2 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Boston-Cambridge-Newton 108.3
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom 106.7
Goods
Boston-Cambridge-Newton 99.7
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom 105.2
Services
Boston-Cambridge-Newton 148.8
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom 151.3
Rents
Boston-Cambridge-Newton 148.4
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom 130.2
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Boston-Cambridge-Newton would need to be in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom for the same purchasing power:
| In Boston-Cambridge-Newton | In Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,263 | $-737 |
| $75,000 | $73,894 | $-1,106 |
| $100,000 | $98,526 | $-1,474 |
| $150,000 | $147,789 | $-2,211 |
$ in Boston-Cambridge-Newton = in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (108.3 → 106.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom more expensive than Boston-Cambridge-Newton?
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom is 1.5% less expensive than Boston-Cambridge-Newton. The overall cost index is 106.7 vs 108.3 (national average = 100).
What salary in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom equals $100K in Boston-Cambridge-Newton?
A $100,000 salary in Boston-Cambridge-Newton has the same purchasing power as $98,526 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Boston-Cambridge-Newton and Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom?
Rents in Boston-Cambridge-Newton are indexed at 148.4 while Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom is at 130.2 (national average = 100). Boston-Cambridge-Newton has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.