Overall
- Binghamton
- 92.9
- Utica-Rome
- 92.7
Diff -0.2 RPP
Binghamton vs Utica-Rome
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Utica-Rome is 0.2% less expensive than Binghamton.
0.2% less expensive
Utica-Rome, NY is 0.2% less expensive than Binghamton, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in Binghamton buys about the same as $99,801 in Utica-Rome; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 92.9 (Binghamton) vs 92.7 (Utica-Rome)
- $100k in Binghamton ≈ $99,801 purchasing power in Utica-Rome
- Rents drives the gap (-3.6 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:NY 92.9→92.7
PHOTO-FINISH · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- SAME-STATE Same state · NY
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Binghamton
92.9
Cost Index
Utica-Rome
92.7
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Binghamton, NY and Utica-Rome, NY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Utica-Rome is 3.6 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Binghamton corresponds to $99,801 in Utica-Rome.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Binghamton
- 99.7
- Utica-Rome
- 99.7
Diff 0.0 RPP
Services
- Binghamton
- 131.6
- Utica-Rome
- 131.9
Diff +0.3 RPP
Rents
- Binghamton
- 69.7
- Utica-Rome
- 66.1
Diff -3.6 RPP
| Category | Binghamton | Utica-Rome | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.9 | 92.7 | -0.2 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 99.7 | 0.0 |
| Services | 131.6 | 131.9 | +0.3 |
| Rents | 69.7 | 66.1 | -3.6 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Binghamton 92.9
Utica-Rome 92.7
Goods
Binghamton 99.7
Utica-Rome 99.7
Services
Binghamton 131.6
Utica-Rome 131.9
Rents
Binghamton 69.7
Utica-Rome 66.1
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Binghamton would need to be in Utica-Rome for the same purchasing power:
| In Binghamton | In Utica-Rome | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,900 | $-100 |
| $75,000 | $74,851 | $-149 |
| $100,000 | $99,801 | $-199 |
| $150,000 | $149,701 | $-299 |
$ in Binghamton = in Utica-Rome
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Utica-Rome more expensive than Binghamton?
Utica-Rome is 0.2% less expensive than Binghamton. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Utica-Rome equals $100K in Binghamton?
A $100,000 salary in Binghamton has the same purchasing power as $99,801 in Utica-Rome. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Binghamton and Utica-Rome?
Rents in Binghamton are indexed at 69.7 while Utica-Rome is at 66.1 (national average = 100). Binghamton has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.