Overall
- Binghamton
- 92.9
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 92.9
Diff +0.1 RPP
Binghamton vs Oshkosh-Neenah
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Oshkosh-Neenah is 0.1% more expensive than Binghamton.
0.1% more expensive
Oshkosh-Neenah, WI is 0.1% more expensive than Binghamton, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.9 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in Binghamton buys about the same as $100,071 in Oshkosh-Neenah; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 92.9 (Binghamton) vs 92.9 (Oshkosh-Neenah)
- $100k in Binghamton ≈ $100,071 purchasing power in Oshkosh-Neenah
- Services drives the gap (-41.0 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:WI 92.9→92.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE NY × WI
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Binghamton
92.9
Cost Index
Oshkosh-Neenah
92.9
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Binghamton, NY and Oshkosh-Neenah, WI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Oshkosh-Neenah is 41.0 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Binghamton to $100,071 in Oshkosh-Neenah, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Binghamton
- 99.7
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 93.8
Diff -5.9 RPP
Services
- Binghamton
- 131.6
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 90.6
Diff -41.0 RPP
Rents
- Binghamton
- 69.7
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 74.4
Diff +4.7 RPP
| Category | Binghamton | Oshkosh-Neenah | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.9 | 92.9 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 93.8 | -5.9 |
| Services | 131.6 | 90.6 | -41.0 |
| Rents | 69.7 | 74.4 | +4.7 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Binghamton 92.9
Oshkosh-Neenah 92.9
Goods
Binghamton 99.7
Oshkosh-Neenah 93.8
Services
Binghamton 131.6
Oshkosh-Neenah 90.6
Rents
Binghamton 69.7
Oshkosh-Neenah 74.4
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Binghamton would need to be in Oshkosh-Neenah for the same purchasing power:
| In Binghamton | In Oshkosh-Neenah | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,036 | +$36 |
| $75,000 | $75,053 | +$53 |
| $100,000 | $100,071 | +$71 |
| $150,000 | $150,107 | +$107 |
$ in Binghamton = in Oshkosh-Neenah
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 92.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Oshkosh-Neenah more expensive than Binghamton?
Oshkosh-Neenah is 0.1% more expensive than Binghamton. The overall cost index is 92.9 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Oshkosh-Neenah equals $100K in Binghamton?
A $100,000 salary in Binghamton has the same purchasing power as $100,071 in Oshkosh-Neenah. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Binghamton and Oshkosh-Neenah?
Rents in Binghamton are indexed at 69.7 while Oshkosh-Neenah is at 74.4 (national average = 100). Oshkosh-Neenah has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.