Overall
- Binghamton
- 92.9
- Akron
- 93.4
Diff +0.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Akron is 0.5% more expensive than Binghamton.
Akron, OH is 0.5% more expensive than Binghamton, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 93.4 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in Binghamton buys about the same as $100,546 in Akron; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:OH 92.9→93.4
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Binghamton, NY and Akron, OH are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Akron is 35.1 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Binghamton to $100,546 in Akron, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.5 RPP
Diff -6.1 RPP
Diff -35.1 RPP
Diff +7.1 RPP
| Category | Binghamton | Akron | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.9 | 93.4 | +0.5 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 93.6 | -6.1 |
| Services | 131.6 | 96.4 | -35.1 |
| Rents | 69.7 | 76.8 | +7.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Binghamton and Akron share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.5 to 0.5 RPP points. Akron remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (11.0 to 6.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Binghamton RPP | Akron RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 97.0 | 92.5 | 4.5 points Binghamton higher |
| 2012 | 94.9 | 95.5 | 0.6 points Akron higher |
| 2016 | 96.1 | 95.2 | 0.9 points Binghamton higher |
| 2020 | 96.9 | 93.5 | 3.4 points Binghamton higher |
| 2024 | 92.9 | 93.4 | 0.5 points Akron higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Binghamton would need to be in Akron for the same purchasing power:
| In Binghamton | In Akron | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,273 | +$273 |
| $75,000 | $75,409 | +$409 |
| $100,000 | $100,546 | +$546 |
| $150,000 | $150,819 | +$819 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 93.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Akron is 0.5% more expensive than Binghamton. The overall cost index is 93.4 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Binghamton has the same purchasing power as $100,546 in Akron. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Binghamton are indexed at 69.7 while Akron is at 76.8 (national average = 100). Akron has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.