Overall
- Akron
- 93.4
- Binghamton
- 92.9
Diff -0.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Binghamton is 0.5% less expensive than Akron.
Binghamton, NY is 0.5% less expensive than Akron, OH on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.9 vs 93.4). A $100,000 salary in Akron buys about the same as $99,457 in Binghamton; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair OH:NY 93.4→92.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Akron, OH and Binghamton, NY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Binghamton is 35.1 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Akron to $99,457 in Binghamton, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.5 RPP
Diff +6.1 RPP
Diff +35.1 RPP
Diff -7.1 RPP
| Category | Akron | Binghamton | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 93.4 | 92.9 | -0.5 |
| Goods | 93.6 | 99.7 | +6.1 |
| Services | 96.4 | 131.6 | +35.1 |
| Rents | 76.8 | 69.7 | -7.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Akron and Binghamton share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.5 to 0.5 RPP points. Akron remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (11.0 to 6.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Akron RPP | Binghamton RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.5 | 97.0 | 4.5 points Binghamton higher |
| 2012 | 95.5 | 94.9 | 0.6 points Akron higher |
| 2016 | 95.2 | 96.1 | 0.9 points Binghamton higher |
| 2020 | 93.5 | 96.9 | 3.4 points Binghamton higher |
| 2024 | 93.4 | 92.9 | 0.5 points Akron higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Akron would need to be in Binghamton for the same purchasing power:
| In Akron | In Binghamton | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,728 | $-272 |
| $75,000 | $74,593 | $-407 |
| $100,000 | $99,457 | $-543 |
| $150,000 | $149,185 | $-815 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.4 → 92.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Binghamton is 0.5% less expensive than Akron. The overall cost index is 92.9 vs 93.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Akron has the same purchasing power as $99,457 in Binghamton. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Akron are indexed at 76.8 while Binghamton is at 69.7 (national average = 100). Akron has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.