Overall
- Ann Arbor
- 100.9
- Naples-Marco Island
- 103.2
Diff +2.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Naples-Marco Island is 2.3% more expensive than Ann Arbor.
Naples-Marco Island, FL is 2.3% more expensive than Ann Arbor, MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.2 vs 100.9). A $100,000 salary in Ann Arbor buys about the same as $102,300 in Naples-Marco Island; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MI:FL 100.9→103.2
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +2.3 RPP
Diff +2.5 RPP
Diff -10.4 RPP
Diff +4.1 RPP
| Category | Ann Arbor | Naples-Marco Island | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.9 | 103.2 | +2.3 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 96.2 | +2.5 |
| Services | 98.2 | 87.8 | -10.4 |
| Rents | 125.3 | 129.4 | +4.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Naples-Marco Island is 10.4 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Naples-Marco Island, FL is 2.3% more expensive than Ann Arbor, MI, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.3-point overall gap.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Ann Arbor to $102,300 in Naples-Marco Island, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Ann Arbor would need to be in Naples-Marco Island for the same purchasing power:
| In Ann Arbor | In Naples-Marco Island | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,150 | +$1,150 |
| $75,000 | $76,725 | +$1,725 |
| $100,000 | $102,300 | +$2,300 |
| $150,000 | $153,450 | +$3,450 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.9 → 103.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Ann Arbor and Naples-Marco Island share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 0.7 to 2.3 RPP points. Naples-Marco Island remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (5.0 to 10.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Ann Arbor RPP | Naples-Marco Island RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 103.6 | 104.3 | 0.7 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2012 | 100.9 | 101.6 | 0.8 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2016 | 98.4 | 103.8 | 5.4 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2020 | 98.6 | 99.1 | 0.5 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2024 | 100.9 | 103.2 | 2.3 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Naples-Marco Island is 2.3% more expensive than Ann Arbor. The overall cost index is 103.2 vs 100.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Ann Arbor has the same purchasing power as $102,300 in Naples-Marco Island. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Ann Arbor are indexed at 125.3 while Naples-Marco Island is at 129.4 (national average = 100). Naples-Marco Island has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.