Overall
- Abilene
- 90.4
- Beaumont-Port Arthur
- 90.0
Diff -0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Beaumont-Port Arthur is 0.4% less expensive than Abilene.
Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX is 0.4% less expensive than Abilene, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.0 vs 90.4). A $100,000 salary in Abilene buys about the same as $99,648 in Beaumont-Port Arthur; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:TX 90.4→90.0
PHOTO-FINISH · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Abilene, TX and Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Beaumont-Port Arthur is 2.9 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Abilene corresponds to $99,648 in Beaumont-Port Arthur.
Diff -0.3 RPP
Diff 0.0 RPP
Diff +1.9 RPP
Diff -2.9 RPP
| Category | Abilene | Beaumont-Port Arthur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.4 | 90.0 | -0.3 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 93.8 | 0.0 |
| Services | 81.2 | 83.1 | +1.9 |
| Rents | 73.8 | 70.9 | -2.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Abilene and Beaumont-Port Arthur share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.2 to 0.3 RPP points. Abilene remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 4.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (2.0 to 2.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Abilene RPP | Beaumont-Port Arthur RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.2 | 93.4 | 1.2 points Beaumont-Port Arthur higher |
| 2012 | 94.1 | 93.3 | 0.8 points Abilene higher |
| 2016 | 93.3 | 94.8 | 1.5 points Beaumont-Port Arthur higher |
| 2020 | 90.3 | 90.1 | 0.1 points Abilene higher |
| 2024 | 90.4 | 90.0 | 0.3 points Abilene higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Abilene would need to be in Beaumont-Port Arthur for the same purchasing power:
| In Abilene | In Beaumont-Port Arthur | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,824 | $-176 |
| $75,000 | $74,736 | $-264 |
| $100,000 | $99,648 | $-352 |
| $150,000 | $149,472 | $-528 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.4 → 90.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Beaumont-Port Arthur is 0.4% less expensive than Abilene. The overall cost index is 90.0 vs 90.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Abilene has the same purchasing power as $99,648 in Beaumont-Port Arthur. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Abilene are indexed at 73.8 while Beaumont-Port Arthur is at 70.9 (national average = 100). Abilene has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.