Yuma vs Walla Walla

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Walla Walla is 6.3% more expensive than Yuma.

6.3% more expensive

Walla Walla, WA is 6.3% more expensive than Yuma, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.5 vs 92.7). A $100,000 salary in Yuma buys about the same as $106,270 in Walla Walla; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 92.7 (Yuma) vs 98.5 (Walla Walla)
  • $100k in Yuma ≈ $106,270 purchasing power in Walla Walla
  • Rents drives the gap (+12.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AZ:WA 92.7→98.5

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE AZ × WA
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Yuma would need to be in Walla Walla for the same purchasing power:

In Yuma In Walla Walla Difference
$50,000 $53,135 +$3,135
$75,000 $79,703 +$4,703
$100,000 $106,270 +$6,270
$150,000 $159,406 +$9,406
$ in Yuma = in Walla Walla

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.7 → 98.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Walla Walla, WA is 6.3% more expensive than Yuma, AZ, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.8-point overall gap.

Rents leads the difference, with Walla Walla 12.8 points higher than Yuma. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Yuma corresponds to $106,270 in Walla Walla.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Yuma
92.7
Walla Walla
98.5
Goods
Yuma
96.2
Walla Walla
105.0
Services
Yuma
87.8
Walla Walla
94.3
Rents
Yuma
73.8
Walla Walla
86.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Yuma
92.7
Cost Index
Walla Walla
98.5
Cost Index

How the Price Gap Changed

Yuma and Walla Walla share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 3.2 to 5.8 RPP points. Walla Walla remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 28.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (21.6 to 6.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Yuma RPP Walla Walla RPP Relative Gap
2008 92.4 95.6 3.2 points Walla Walla higher
2012 93.8 95.1 1.3 points Walla Walla higher
2016 92.7 96.3 3.6 points Walla Walla higher
2020 88.7 95.2 6.5 points Walla Walla higher
2024 92.7 98.5 5.8 points Walla Walla higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Walla Walla more expensive than Yuma?

Walla Walla is 6.3% more expensive than Yuma. The overall cost index is 98.5 vs 92.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Walla Walla equals $100K in Yuma?

A $100,000 salary in Yuma has the same purchasing power as $106,270 in Walla Walla. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Yuma and Walla Walla?

Rents in Yuma are indexed at 73.8 while Walla Walla is at 86.6 (national average = 100). Walla Walla has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.