Walla Walla vs Yuma

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yuma is 5.9% less expensive than Walla Walla.

5.9% less expensive

Yuma, AZ is 5.9% less expensive than Walla Walla, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 98.5). A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla buys about the same as $94,100 in Yuma; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 98.5 (Walla Walla) vs 92.7 (Yuma)
  • $100k in Walla Walla ≈ $94,100 purchasing power in Yuma
  • Rents drives the gap (-12.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WA:AZ 98.5→92.7

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE WA × AZ
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Walla Walla would need to be in Yuma for the same purchasing power:

In Walla Walla In Yuma Difference
$50,000 $47,050 $-2,950
$75,000 $70,575 $-4,425
$100,000 $94,100 $-5,900
$150,000 $141,149 $-8,851
$ in Walla Walla = in Yuma

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.5 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Yuma, AZ is 5.9% less expensive than Walla Walla, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.8-point overall gap.

Rents leads the difference, with Yuma 12.8 points lower than Walla Walla. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Walla Walla corresponds to $94,100 in Yuma.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Walla Walla
98.5
Yuma
92.7
Goods
Walla Walla
105.0
Yuma
96.2
Services
Walla Walla
94.3
Yuma
87.8
Rents
Walla Walla
86.6
Yuma
73.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

Walla Walla
98.5
Cost Index
Yuma
92.7
Cost Index

How the Price Gap Changed

Walla Walla and Yuma share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 3.2 to 5.8 RPP points. Walla Walla remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 28.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (21.6 to 6.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Walla Walla RPP Yuma RPP Relative Gap
2008 95.6 92.4 3.2 points Walla Walla higher
2012 95.1 93.8 1.3 points Walla Walla higher
2016 96.3 92.7 3.6 points Walla Walla higher
2020 95.2 88.7 6.5 points Walla Walla higher
2024 98.5 92.7 5.8 points Walla Walla higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yuma more expensive than Walla Walla?

Yuma is 5.9% less expensive than Walla Walla. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 98.5 (national average = 100).

What salary in Yuma equals $100K in Walla Walla?

A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla has the same purchasing power as $94,100 in Yuma. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Walla Walla and Yuma?

Rents in Walla Walla are indexed at 86.6 while Yuma is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Walla Walla has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.