Overall
- Walla Walla
- 98.5
- Ithaca
- 103.3
Diff +4.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Ithaca is 4.9% more expensive than Walla Walla.
Ithaca, NY is 4.9% more expensive than Walla Walla, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.3 vs 98.5). A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla buys about the same as $104,870 in Ithaca; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:NY 98.5→103.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +4.8 RPP
Diff -5.3 RPP
Diff +37.3 RPP
Diff +41.8 RPP
| Category | Walla Walla | Ithaca | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.5 | 103.3 | +4.8 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 99.7 | -5.3 |
| Services | 94.3 | 131.6 | +37.3 |
| Rents | 86.6 | 128.4 | +41.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Ithaca is 41.8 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Ithaca, NY is 4.9% more expensive than Walla Walla, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.8-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Ithaca is above 100 while Walla Walla is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Walla Walla corresponds to $104,870 in Ithaca.
What a salary in Walla Walla would need to be in Ithaca for the same purchasing power:
| In Walla Walla | In Ithaca | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,435 | +$2,435 |
| $75,000 | $78,653 | +$3,653 |
| $100,000 | $104,870 | +$4,870 |
| $150,000 | $157,305 | +$7,305 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.5 → 103.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Ithaca is 4.9% more expensive than Walla Walla. The overall cost index is 103.3 vs 98.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Walla Walla has the same purchasing power as $104,870 in Ithaca. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Walla Walla are indexed at 86.6 while Ithaca is at 128.4 (national average = 100). Ithaca has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.