Overall
- Ithaca
- 103.3
- Walla Walla
- 98.5
Diff -4.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Walla Walla is 4.6% less expensive than Ithaca.
Walla Walla, WA is 4.6% less expensive than Ithaca, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.5 vs 103.3). A $100,000 salary in Ithaca buys about the same as $95,356 in Walla Walla; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:WA 103.3→98.5
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -4.8 RPP
Diff +5.3 RPP
Diff -37.3 RPP
Diff -41.8 RPP
| Category | Ithaca | Walla Walla | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.3 | 98.5 | -4.8 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 105.0 | +5.3 |
| Services | 131.6 | 94.3 | -37.3 |
| Rents | 128.4 | 86.6 | -41.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Walla Walla is 41.8 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Walla Walla, WA is 4.6% less expensive than Ithaca, NY, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.8-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Ithaca is above 100 while Walla Walla is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Ithaca corresponds to $95,356 in Walla Walla.
What a salary in Ithaca would need to be in Walla Walla for the same purchasing power:
| In Ithaca | In Walla Walla | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,678 | $-2,322 |
| $75,000 | $71,517 | $-3,483 |
| $100,000 | $95,356 | $-4,644 |
| $150,000 | $143,034 | $-6,966 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.3 → 98.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Walla Walla is 4.6% less expensive than Ithaca. The overall cost index is 98.5 vs 103.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Ithaca has the same purchasing power as $95,356 in Walla Walla. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Ithaca are indexed at 128.4 while Walla Walla is at 86.6 (national average = 100). Ithaca has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.