Twin Falls vs Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands is 7.1% more expensive than Twin Falls.

7.1% more expensive

Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX is 7.1% more expensive than Twin Falls, ID * on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.6 vs 92.1). A $100,000 salary in Twin Falls buys about the same as $107,080 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 92.1 (Twin Falls) vs 98.6 (Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands)
  • $100k in Twin Falls ≈ $107,080 purchasing power in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
  • Rents drives the gap (+30.7 RPP points)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Twin Falls would need to be in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands for the same purchasing power:

In Twin Falls In Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands Difference
$50,000 $53,540 +$3,540
$75,000 $80,310 +$5,310
$100,000 $107,080 +$7,080
$150,000 $160,620 +$10,620
$ in Twin Falls = in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.1 → 98.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX is 7.1% more expensive than Twin Falls, ID *, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.5-point overall gap.

Rents leads the difference, with Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 30.7 points higher than Twin Falls. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Twin Falls corresponds to $107,080 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands.

Category Breakdown

Category Twin Falls Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands Difference
Overall 92.1 98.6 +6.5
Goods 96.2 100.6 +4.5
Services 70.0 95.3 +25.3
Rents 73.8 104.5 +30.7

Visual Comparison

Overall
Twin Falls
92.1
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
98.6
Goods
Twin Falls
96.2
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
100.6
Services
Twin Falls
70.0
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
95.3
Rents
Twin Falls
73.8
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
104.5

Vertical line = national average (100)

Twin Falls
92.1
Cost Index
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
98.6
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands more expensive than Twin Falls?

Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands is 7.1% more expensive than Twin Falls. The overall cost index is 98.6 vs 92.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands equals $100K in Twin Falls?

A $100,000 salary in Twin Falls has the same purchasing power as $107,080 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Twin Falls and Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands?

Rents in Twin Falls are indexed at 73.8 while Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands is at 104.5 (national average = 100). Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.