Overall
- Terre Haute
- 87.8
- Tuscaloosa
- 87.7
Diff -0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Tuscaloosa is 0.1% less expensive than Terre Haute.
Tuscaloosa, AL is 0.1% less expensive than Terre Haute, IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.7 vs 87.8). A $100,000 salary in Terre Haute buys about the same as $99,915 in Tuscaloosa; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair IN:AL 87.8→87.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Terre Haute, IN and Tuscaloosa, AL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Tuscaloosa is 6.3 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Terre Haute corresponds to $99,915 in Tuscaloosa.
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff +2.1 RPP
Diff -2.2 RPP
Diff +6.3 RPP
| Category | Terre Haute | Tuscaloosa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.8 | 87.7 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 94.3 | 96.4 | +2.1 |
| Services | 86.6 | 84.4 | -2.2 |
| Rents | 51.9 | 58.2 | +6.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Terre Haute and Tuscaloosa share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.7 to 0.1 RPP points. Terre Haute remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 7.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (4.8 to 2.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Terre Haute RPP | Tuscaloosa RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 89.1 | 89.7 | 0.7 points Tuscaloosa higher |
| 2012 | 89.2 | 90.6 | 1.4 points Tuscaloosa higher |
| 2016 | 87.6 | 90.9 | 3.2 points Tuscaloosa higher |
| 2020 | 87.4 | 87.1 | 0.3 points Terre Haute higher |
| 2024 | 87.8 | 87.7 | 0.1 points Terre Haute higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Terre Haute would need to be in Tuscaloosa for the same purchasing power:
| In Terre Haute | In Tuscaloosa | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,957 | $-43 |
| $75,000 | $74,936 | $-64 |
| $100,000 | $99,915 | $-85 |
| $150,000 | $149,872 | $-128 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.8 → 87.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Tuscaloosa is 0.1% less expensive than Terre Haute. The overall cost index is 87.7 vs 87.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Terre Haute has the same purchasing power as $99,915 in Tuscaloosa. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Terre Haute are indexed at 51.9 while Tuscaloosa is at 58.2 (national average = 100). Tuscaloosa has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.