Overall
- Springfield
- 96.1
- Salem
- 103.6
Diff +7.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Salem is 7.9% more expensive than Springfield.
Salem, OR is 7.9% more expensive than Springfield, MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.6 vs 96.1). A $100,000 salary in Springfield buys about the same as $107,899 in Salem; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MA:OR 96.1→103.6
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +7.6 RPP
Diff +8.2 RPP
Diff -50.3 RPP
Diff +34.6 RPP
| Category | Springfield | Salem | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.1 | 103.6 | +7.6 |
| Goods | 97.0 | 105.3 | +8.2 |
| Services | 155.0 | 104.7 | -50.3 |
| Rents | 75.8 | 110.3 | +34.6 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Salem is 50.3 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Salem, OR is 7.9% more expensive than Springfield, MA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 7.6-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Salem is above 100 while Springfield is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Springfield to $107,899 in Salem, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Springfield would need to be in Salem for the same purchasing power:
| In Springfield | In Salem | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,950 | +$3,950 |
| $75,000 | $80,924 | +$5,924 |
| $100,000 | $107,899 | +$7,899 |
| $150,000 | $161,849 | +$11,849 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.1 → 103.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Springfield and Salem share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 5.3 to 7.6 RPP points. Salem remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 38.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (3.7 to 34.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Springfield RPP | Salem RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.5 | 94.1 | 5.3 points Springfield higher |
| 2012 | 97.8 | 101.1 | 3.3 points Salem higher |
| 2016 | 99.4 | 97.1 | 2.3 points Springfield higher |
| 2020 | 99.1 | 100.9 | 1.9 points Salem higher |
| 2024 | 96.1 | 103.6 | 7.6 points Salem higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Salem is 7.9% more expensive than Springfield. The overall cost index is 103.6 vs 96.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Springfield has the same purchasing power as $107,899 in Salem. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Springfield are indexed at 75.8 while Salem is at 110.3 (national average = 100). Salem has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.